To my elected representatives and fellow
citizens:
I am an advocate for preserving “Private Property Rights” for all of us and
especially for our children.
This is not
a liberal or conservative issue.
I prompted the narrator for the Broadcasters Forum to ask our GOP candidates
for US Congress what they knew about Agenda 21 and what the impact would be on
local governments.
Every candidate
expressed basic knowledge of the topic.
Liz Chaney stated it had “a foreign component” and Ex Teton County
Commissioner and State Legislator Christensen knocked the ball out of the park
by stating the code word to get Agenda 21 actions past the local yokels is to
call it some version of "Comprehensive Land use Planning."
Our local elected officials claimed they had never heard of Agenda 21 a few
years ago when they reduced citizens Private Property Rights by adopting the
“Cheyenne Unified Development Code (UDC).” This attached article by Tom DeWeese
may describe the results of their willful ignorance. The series of 10-minute
videos at
by Tom DeWeese is still the best
introduction to the issues. I hope our
elected officials will click the link to the 2-hour conference call for elected
officials at the end of the article.
Then look at his website, subscribe to his letter, and stay current on
Agenda 21 sponsored threats to our grandchildren’s birthrights.
Remember, Platte County Commissioners flatly reject the Land-Use-Plan
proposed by the Agenda 21 contractors.
The citizens on the Cheyenne Planning Commission that endorsed
PlanCheyenne, voted to kill the power transfer hidden in the UDC.
I think it is time for a serious review of
the 290 page Cheyenne UDC by local citizens with a good eraser in hand as
requested by the citizens at every public hearing on the UDC.
I support M. Lee for Commissioner.
M.
Lee states the obvious in direct language and beings issues to the County
Commissioners for resolution.
I support the reelection of Commissioner Amber Ash.
Amber does her homework and took the time to
work with a group of concerned citizens to propose over 100 amendments to
improve PlanCheyenne.
I do not support Commissioner Troy Thompson’s
reelection. At the commissioner meeting to revise PlanCheyenne, he stated that
he had read about Agenda 21, and said it did not threaten local property
rights. He led the discussion to vote
down most of the amendments Amber negotiated with the citizen’s committee.
Citizens it is important to ensure that every candidate to represent you has
taken a verifiable stand to protect your children’s future property rights from
government over reach.
If you think this email has value, feel free to send it on.
Please read the following letter.
Thanks,
Albert S.
Cheyenne, WY
Listen
This Time or HUD Will Destroy Your City
July
20, 2016
America’s
homeowners should be shaking in their shoes. The federal government has decided
that people who have worked, saved and planned so they can buy homes in nice,
safe neighborhoods of their own choosing, are racists. They charge that it is a
“social injustice.” The government now claims that it’s unfair unless everyone
can have the same, whether they earn it or not. And it doesn’t matter whether
they can afford such a home. We’re told that it’s racist to deny someone an
equal home, just because they don’t have the money for it. White privilege,
don’t you know.
You
may be watching the “Black Lives Matter” protests taking place on city streets
around the country. You may be alarmed that such violence can happen in your
downtown. And you may wonder what is behind such activity. Well, get ready for
the same kind of threats and violence to possibly come directly into your own
neighborhood simply because you have a nice house.
Does
that sound far fetched? Well you need the details on how the federal Housing and
Urban Development agency (HUD) is working to enforce its new rule called
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH).
Social
Justice is the name of the game under AFFH. That means the rule of law is
dismissed in favor of “fairness.” Social Justice is enforced on us using pure
emotion, basically operating on the level of a twelve year old girl in a pet
shop who doesn’t like seeing the puppies with their sad eyes looking out from a
cage. “Let the poor little doggies out,” she cries. Social Justice is purely
based on redistribution of wealth. Your wealth. That’s money you worked for,
saved, invested, and protected for YOUR needs; YOUR dreams; YOUR
future.
“SELFISH,”
cries the social justice mongers. Why should you have so much when others have
so little? Never mind that you had to save your money while forced to pay 50% of
it in taxes that theoretically went to those less fortunate. The fact is, there
is no “justice” in such a policy. Envy, desire, jealousy and theft are much
closer to the truth.
Do
you think that sounds harsh. Well, Mr. and Mrs. Property Owner, tell me how
harsh this sounds! As reported by John Anthony of Sustainable Freedom
Lab:
- First
HUD is forcing every community which is applying for its grants to complete an
“Assessment of Fair Housing” to identify all “contributing factors” to
discrimination. These include a complete break down of race, income levels,
religion and national origin of every single person living there. They use this
information to determine if the neighborhood meets a preset “balance,”
determined by HUD.
- Second,
HUD demands a detailed plan showing how the community intends to eliminate the
“contributing factors” to this “imbalance.”
- To
produce the community’s plan for compliance, HUD rules demand that a wide array
of “interested parties” participate in its creation, just to assure community
input and to keep things fair, of course. These include civil rights groups,
affordable housing developers and civic activist organizations. They call this
“civil society.” All have a specific, left-of center agenda and a definite
interest in the outcome.
- Once
the plan is prepared, then the community is required to sign an agreement to
take no actions that are “materially inconsistent with its obligation to
affirmatively further fair housing.”
- Once
the community provides answers as to how they will implement the grant under
these guidelines to HUD’s satisfaction, then they will receive the
grant.
These
are the rules your locally elected representatives are forced to agree to in
order to get that “free” grant money. And nearly every city council and county
commission in the nation has already taken such grants.
Now
ask yourselves, just why HUD would be so insistent in demanding that the
community tie itself to the so-called civil rights groups in order to get the
grant. The answer to that question is diabolical.
You
see, if the community hesitates to comply in any way; perhaps local voters
decide to turn down a program, or there aren’t enough local funds to fully
comply, then HUD has a secret weapon waiting for them. Lack of compliance, in
HUD’s eyes, results in law suits over civil rights violations.
The
civil rights groups them become a useful tool. They start protests and demand
“fairness.” They get on television. They pressure city hall. And to the rescue
comes HUD with its own law suits.
Baltimore,
Maryland became one of the first cities to feel such pressure and threats as the
NAACP sued Baltimore over alleged housing segregation. The NAACP argument was
that Section 8 subsidized housing programs “bunch people together, and that only
fuels more crime and other problems.”
The
solution, says the NAACP is to “integrate the poor among wealthier families.”
Outrageous as it sounds, such social justice mongers actually accuse those
living in affluent neighborhoods of “self segregation for white
privilege.”
The
pressure from these groups, along with the massive force of HUD backing them,
has resulted in Baltimore being forced to agree to spending $30 million of
tax-payer dollars over the next ten years to build 1,000 low income homes in
affluent neighborhoods. The result will be a destruction of property values and
the loss of equity for the homeowners. In short, destruction of earned wealth,
leading to destruction of the middle class. That’s what socialism does. It
creates more poor.
On
top of that, Baltimore has moved to destroy the property rights of landlords by
denying them the ability to not rent to people who can’t afford their
properties. Of course the government doesn’t say it that way, preferring to
pretend that denying people who can’t pay for your property as “discrimination.”
And who will pay the landlord when he is stuck with the bill? The only result
will be fewer landlords and fewer choices for housing.
In
Portland, Oregon, the infamous “poster child” of federal Smart Growth
development policies, the city council has now unanimously approved a new tax to
raise $12 million per year to pay for “affordable housing.” “The lack of
affordable housing is the greatest crisis facing our city right now,” says
Commissioner Dan Saltsman. Perhaps he should take a long look at the twenty year
Smart Growth history of Portland in which massive amounts of land were locked
away to limit the “sprawl” of the city. This lead to land shortages, which led
to bans on single family homes, which led to the need for massive high rise
apartment buildings, all of which led to higher costs and shortages of homes.
Now, they have a “crisis “of low income housings. Their solution now is another
tax on construction, driving up housing costs even more.
Do
they ever learn? Government control over every aspect of our lives, as demanded
by socialism never works. High costs, shortages and sacrifice are the only
result. It has never been different wherever it has been enforced.
Now
HUD is rushing to enforce AFFH with a vengeance. HUD has raced to make
Westchester County, New York the example for more suits. Right out of the new
HUD playbook, a private civil rights group called the Anti-Discrimination Center
sued the county under the Federal False Claims Act, claiming Westchester County
lied when they filled out the HUD compliance form for their grant. Since there
is no official definition of “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” the
definition is whatever HUD declares it to be. There is no way for the local
government to win such a suit. The result of the suit against Westchester County
was $62.5 million – a sum greater than all of the community development and
related funding received by the county from HUD.
More
suits are being filed against communities across the nation as HUD steps up its
enforcement and local officials are scared, wondering what they can do to fight
back, if anything. Some have tried to stand up to HUD, refusing to comply. But
once the law suits are filed, and the “community organizers” start their
pressure, most have quickly backed down.
Let’s
make one thing clear. The civil rights legislation of the 1960s made it illegal
to bar people from neighborhoods based on their color or ethnic background. It
guaranteed them the opportunity. But it said nothing about forcing people into
neighborhoods to live beyond their means. No one, no matter their color or
ethnic background, has a right to force their way in to a neighborhood they
can’t afford. Instead, they must do the same thing those who already live there
did; work, save, invest and prepare. Then no one can stop them. It has noting to
do with race or some perceived special “privilege.”
For
twenty years we opponents of Agenda 21 and Smart Growth have warned of the
dangers of taking these HUD grants. We were ignored and called conspiracy nuts.
The result now is that HUD has taken the gloves off. There is no longer a
pretense that any kind of local control over spending the grant money exists.
HUD now controls your community. Property rights are dead, property values are
dying, and the local officials you elected to guide your community have been
rendered irrelevant by HUD mobsters who have come back to collect.
So
what do local community representatives do? First and foremost STOP TAKING THE
GRANTS!!!!! Second, stand up to these thugs who intend to rule our communities.
Stand up to the law suits and stand up to the pressure of the special interest
groups. In short, represent your community as you were elected to do. And
finally, you might try listening to those of us who have studied these policies
for decades instead of the slithering snakes of the American Planning
Association and their ilk who fill their own pockets with those
grants.
Our
American liberties are counting on local and state officials to start standing
on your own two feet and represent US, instead of cowering in a corner because
you sold us down the river.
The
American Policy Center is now working with officials who want to understand and
fight back to save their communities. Recently we held a conference call for
such officials. Here is a link to it so you can hear first hand
of the dangers you are facing and some solutions for you to fight back. Perhaps
this time you’ll listen.
Tom
DeWeese, president of the American Policy Center, is one of the nation’s leading
experts on Agenda 21 and its assault on property rights and personal freedom. He
is author of the book “Now Tell Me I was Wrong” and editor of the website The
DeWeese Report.
No comments:
Post a Comment