All Obama's Got Is
Hope
President Obama wrote an autobiography The Audacity of Hope. Maybe
he should have read the book with a critical review.
Even though he's been President of the United States for 4 years and nearly
nine months, he still talks like hope is the end-all for his tenure and not real
results. That policy is getting America in trouble internationally.
On Sunday, on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos", the President
had a candid interview with another friendly press face who tossed some
slow-pitch softballs to the President. He not only didn't hit any home runs but
worse he seemed to strike out as he said some things that simply should never
have been said. The Rant culled a transcript of the interview.
Stephanopoulos turned to Obama with "And on the eve of the deal [between
Russia and Syria] we went inside the White House to speak with the president. He
was confident, convinced that America is in a better position now than when he
was poised to order military action just two weeks ago."
Obama: "Well, we are certainly in a better position...my entire goal
throughout this exercise is to make sure what happened on August 21st [gas
attack] does not happen again...that is a violation of international law and is
a violation of common decency."
Superb! He wanted to get involved in a civil war where 400 children were
gassed. If this was a violation of international law then why was there no
outrage when more than 310,000 children were killed in the Iraq-Iran War and
both sides used gas weapons? That crossed national boundaries, yet the world let
out one big collective yawn. But Obama was ready to take up the battle cry for
400. There's a flaw in his original argument because he interjected himself into
the Syrian mess more than a year ago when he warned Bashar al-Assad against
using chemical weapons.
But Obama really sticks his foot in his mouth when he rolls on. "Think
about where we were [then]. The event happened and the initial response is the
Syrians act as if they don't know anything about it."
Hm-m? Wasn't that the response of his administration when Benghazi
happened? Wasn't that his administration's response when the IRS scandal broke?
Wasn't that the results of all the privacy problems the NSA has been accused of
with its internal spying? Why should Syria act any different? Al-Assad has
obviously been watching the master tap-dancer in action.
But the lack-of-teleprompter disease didn't stop there. Obama continued to
ramble about new developments on Syria.
The question was: Does that tell you Putin is willing to lie to protect
Assad?
Obama: Nobody around the world takes seriously the idea that the rebels
perpetrated this attack. Now what is true is there are radical elements in the
opposition, including folks who are affiliated with al-Qaeda who, if they got
their hands on chemical weapons would have no compunction using them in or
outside Syria. And the reason we've been so concerned about this (sic) chemical
weapons is because we don't want those folks getting chemical weapons."
Let's get the record straight here. That is a complete contradiction of the
actual situation.
The Obama Administration is arming the rebels in Syria--which is
undoubtedly the real reason for the assault in Benghazi as the weapons went to
Libya then to Turkey where the rebels picked them up in the safe zones and
turned them on al-Assad's forces in Syria--but those fighting ranks contain
people who are not only sworn enemies of the United States but are actively at
war with us every chance they get. And Obama thinks eroding Assad's ability to
kill these U.S. enemies is good? But his whole answer doesn't answer the
question of why the CIA is smuggling weaponry to the rebels in the first place.
It is like the rest of the government is executing a policy that is alien to
Obama's picture.
Here's a different view: As long as the U.S. enemy, al-Qaeda, is engaged in
Syria, the less resources they have to direct at us. If Assad wanted to he could
gas the entire rebel-held portions of Syria. Wouldn't that make him a de facto
ally of Obama's instead of a target?
The "This Week" topic switched to Iran after several minutes more Obama
musings on Syria where Obama, just like his book, "holds out hope" (twice) that
Iran will "understand is that the nuclear weapon issue is a far larger issue for
us than chemical weapons. And so it is my suspicion that the Iranians recognize
they shouldn't draw a lesson that we haven't struck to think we won't strike
Iran. On the other hand, what is...what they should draw from this lesson is
that there is the potential of resolving these issues diplomatically. And, I
think they recognize, in part, because of the extraordinary sanctions that we
placed upon them, that the world community is united when it comes to wanting to
prevent a nuclear arms race in the region...And I hold out that hope."
Overlooking the President's obvious lack of specificity to fact, Obama's
lone nugget of achievement in the Middle East is to "hold out hope."
Obama, however, didn't stop his inane commentary on the next subject
either. Asked about the abundance of armchair criticism for his foreign policy
that cropped up the last two weeks, Obama stated: "Well, you know, I think that
lots of folks here in Washington like to grade on style. Had we rolled out
something that was very smooth and disciplined and linear they would have graded
it well even if it was a disastrous policy. We know because that was how they
graded the Iraq War until it ended up blowing up in our faces. I'm much less
concerned about style points than getting the policy right."
But it was his own "red-line" comment that established policy a year before
a problem existed. He created a situation that didn't have to be crated.
Why didn't he obtain the aid of the Russians a year-ago to defuse the
situation before it exploded? And based on his track record of disregarding
facts he doesn't agree with or that contradict his policy stance, this appears
to be one more instance of a dysfunctional Administration. His eyes may be open
but his mind is already closed to much of the world around him because he knows
best.
If this is his version of getting it right--knocking yards of international
respect from America's crumbling base over a teapot tempest--we ought not to
sleep with one eye open. Where this man is taking us to means we shouldn't sleep
at all because he thinks we, American citizens, are more of a threat than the
"folk" who have declared war on us whom he is willing to furnish aid to.
The President has hope. Too bad that's all he has.
"I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility
to every form of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas
Jefferson
I'd like to remind you the Rant's future is still being
negotiated. It will most likely not be sent but will have to be accessed through
an on-line site for a fee.
If you have any comments or suggestions, please contact
the Rant at this email address, mccrant@gmail.com. Thank you--Mike
No comments:
Post a Comment