Markets Reflect Government, Not Economics
It seems fitting that on the day a black man who's dream was absolute freedom from all tyranny is remembered, the U.S. stock market and the government are closed.
Those two institutes work hand-in-glove. Instead of measuring economic progress the market really only reflects the state of government. There is a hint of promise in the air--the promise that the government we all grew up with is about to implode.
This happenstance occurred to me as I watched a very early-morning financial show that replaced the usual blather about what stocks to buy. Since the market is closed today, the banter was centered on what is happening around the globe, economic-wise. One of the numerous interjectors made the following remark, "The stock market has nothing to do with the economy."
He's right. The market has nothing to do with the economy but has everything to do with government. This is why the government worked so hard to prop up the market on a sea of non-valued, red-ink fiat and proclaimed the "recession" was over in June of 2009 when it rose back to within 20% of the all-time highs.
If the economy were still 11% better than it was when the housing market burst in 2007 no average American can tell it. Yet that is what the current level of the markets would suggest.
The niggling thought is because the market is struggling--it, as a mirror-image of the government--means our government is extremely vulnerable right now.
Here's the way the market disconnected from the economic realm and became a measurement of government health. It is called government over-reach. It all stems from the policies enacted in the foundations of "The Great Society."
The first thing that really came from "The Great Society" was political correctness. This was taught in our schools. As soon as enough of a generation was steeped in this concept, then the government had gained a power never dreamed of by the Founding Fathers--even when they opposed King George violently.
Out of political correctness we got the greatest evil--people who thought because they could control the population by threatening to withhold "entitlements", they could control the environment of nature as well. The human masses, as has been shown by history, have always been relatively easy to control. First you enslave them, then exterminate the few who are foolishly brave enough to fight for their "unalienable rights." Every time but once when the rabble won out over the Establishment, the rabble merely became the tyrants they were against. Only in America was this trend broken.
For a long time our stock market reflected the state of the citizen. But then came the Great Depression. In their travail the citizens listened to a false message of hope, a message rooted in the fact the government could provide for their needs. The fact this was done by stealing wealth from the few who had managed to remain afloat was carefully concealed.
As the years went by, government faced more and more problems of its own making. Each one resulted in a bigger power grab carefully concealed behind political doubletalk. "We'll give you this" or "We'll provide that," or "The American worker deserves better" were all crafted in a way which appealed to man's baser instinct of letting Mommy care for him or her. After all, they were only taking it from those who could afford.
The market went along with the nonsense, even when the government began eliminating Gross Domestic Product with 'service sector' economics as a linchpin.
Then we elected a man who didn't believe in America's difference, American greatness. He split us more deeply than we've been split in 150 years.
But he appealed to those who attended schools where grades were allocated on a curve and everyone passed--whether they did any work or not. Where every student got the same grade because to do otherwise would 'stigmatize' those who received lower scores.
Now the 99% are opposed to the 1% who pay for everything. Without the 1%, the 99% would, surprise, be slaves again. But the buffer now is government who redistributes the wealth. That wealth is coming from a mostly improved service sector, not tangible GDP.
GDP values disappeared in the housing bubble of 2007. More people are afraid of a peak environmental change because there's money and jobs in that false idol promoted by the political class. More money disappears into the rat holes of "tax-exempt, government-approved activities" than into real economic development.
In the '60s Martin Luther King supported the goals of "The Great Society" not knowing the horrors hidden in the details were worse than the segregation policies he knew.
Today the U.S. markets are in decline--appropriate since it also reflects our government's dismantling of our industrial base and self-reliance. America was not established to be part of a global economy. That's what our government wants to be part of, not its citizens.
America became a leader through its essential differences of "unalienable rights." Each citizen's exercise of those unalienable rights put us ahead of the rest. That's why people wanted to come here--there was a distinct difference.
Our government's erosion of those rights is reflected in the market's value since the two have been wedded instead of dating for the past eight-plus years. They are a nice couple, and they deserve each other.
"I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson
No comments:
Post a Comment